MINT vs. FBND
MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINT returned 2.71%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FBND. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.36% expense ratio.
Performance
MINT vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MINT has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 2.71%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.
MINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
MINT vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.86% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINT and FBND is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014 | 0.21 |
The correlation between MINT and FBND shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINT vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
MINT
FBND
MINT vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +15.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +63.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 20.44 | 1.25 | +19.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 93.88 | 2.01 | +91.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 935.03 | 5.97 | +929.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14 | 1.41 | +15.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 6.01 | 0.12 | +5.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.88 | 0.41 | +2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.47 | 0.44 | +2.03 |
Drawdowns
MINT vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -17.25% | +12.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.05% | -2.66% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.16% | -5.94% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.42% | -17.25% | +14.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.62% | -17.25% | +12.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.82% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -3.35% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.90% | -0.90% |
Volatility
MINT vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) is 0.09%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 1.23% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.20% | 2.75% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 3.80% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 5.92% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 6.10% | -5.15% |
MINT vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MINT and FBND have an expense ratio of 0.36%.
Dividends
MINT vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINT and FBND have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBND has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINT dropped -4.62% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 10-year performance, MINT leads with 2.71% vs 2.47% for FBND. Both ETFs have the same 0.36% expense ratio. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MINT has performed better with a 2.71% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MINT and FBND have the same expense ratio: 0.36% per year.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.
MINT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Fidelity.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.14 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MINT and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer