MINT vs. CNYA
MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) and CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while CNYA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. MINT is actively managed, while CNYA is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINT returned 2.72%/yr vs 6.50%/yr for CNYA. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINT charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CNYA.
Performance
MINT vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MINT has underperformed CNYA with an annualized return of 2.72%, while CNYA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.50% annualized return.
MINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
CNYA
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 36.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- -0.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
MINT vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 2.05% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 8.91% | 26.48% | 10.78% | -13.76% | -26.51% | 3.53% | 41.54% | 35.95% | -26.56% | 30.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINT and CNYA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2016 | 0.04 |
The correlation between MINT and CNYA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINT vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
MINT
CNYA
MINT vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MINT | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +14.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +58.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 18.98 | 1.36 | +17.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 94.18 | 4.84 | +89.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 866.10 | 13.30 | +852.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MINT vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum CNYA drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and CNYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINT | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -49.49% | +44.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.05% | -7.59% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.16% | -33.35% | +33.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.42% | -44.65% | +42.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.62% | -49.49% | +44.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -13.73% | +13.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -20.65% | +20.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 2.76% | -2.75% |
Volatility
MINT vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) is 0.11%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINT | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.11% | 7.35% | -7.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.21% | 13.56% | -13.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28% | 18.32% | -18.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 23.91% | -23.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 23.52% | -22.57% |
MINT vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINT has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINT vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than CNYA's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.73% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINT and CNYA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNYA has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to MINT (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINT dropped -4.62% vs CNYA's -49.49%.
On 10-year performance, CNYA leads with 6.50% vs 2.72% for MINT. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CNYA has performed better with a 6.50% return vs 2.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.73% for CNYA.
MINT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CNYA is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MINT and 0.60% for CNYA.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.86 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MINT and CNYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer