MINT.L vs. WOOD.L
MINT.L (PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and WOOD.L (iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while WOOD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index (Net). MINT.L is actively managed, while WOOD.L is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINT.L returned 2.65%/yr vs 4.89%/yr for WOOD.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MINT.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for WOOD.L.
Performance
MINT.L vs. WOOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MINT.L is traded in USD, while WOOD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WOOD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINT.L achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than WOOD.L's -4.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MINT.L has underperformed WOOD.L with an annualized return of 2.65%, while WOOD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 4.89% annualized return.
MINT.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
WOOD.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- 6M
- -9.37%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- -4.65%
- 3Y*
- -1.34%
- 5Y*
- -3.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.89%
MINT.L vs. WOOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.37% | 4.66% | 5.75% | 5.72% | -0.67% | -0.09% | 1.30% | 3.28% | 1.65% | 1.86% |
WOOD.L iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -4.10% | -3.18% | -5.32% | 12.85% | -18.66% | 15.70% | 20.31% | 19.52% | -20.20% | 32.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINT.L and WOOD.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2011 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINT.L vs. WOOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
MINT.L
WOOD.L
MINT.L vs. WOOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WOOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MINT.L | WOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +16.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.53 | 0.97 | +2.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 45.23 | -0.21 | +45.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 230.58 | -0.41 | +230.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MINT.L vs. WOOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINT.L drawdown since its inception was -3.89%, smaller than the maximum WOOD.L drawdown of -83.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT.L and WOOD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINT.L | WOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -83.09% | +79.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -22.00% | +21.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.62% | -23.41% | +22.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.47% | -31.50% | +29.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.89% | -50.27% | +46.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -23.78% | +23.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -39.24% | +39.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 11.45% | -11.43% |
Volatility
MINT.L vs. WOOD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L) is 0.14%, while iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WOOD.L) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that MINT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WOOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINT.L | WOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | 5.21% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.36% | 14.51% | -14.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58% | 18.40% | -17.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.76% | 19.24% | -18.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 19.93% | -18.98% |
MINT.L vs. WOOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINT.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WOOD.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINT.L vs. WOOD.L - Dividend Comparison
MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than WOOD.L's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.01% | 4.43% | 5.18% | 4.81% | 1.51% | 0.34% | 1.17% | 2.63% | 2.33% | 1.56% | 1.31% | 0.79% |
WOOD.L iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.82% | 3.27% | 2.47% | 2.76% | 2.98% | 1.40% | 1.25% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 1.81% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINT.L and WOOD.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MINT.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MINT.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WOOD.L.
MINT.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while WOOD.L is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINT.L and 0.65% for WOOD.L.
Find the right allocation for MINT.L and WOOD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer