WOOD.L vs. IITU.L
WOOD.L (iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - WOOD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WOOD.L returned 4.61%/yr vs 25.26%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WOOD.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
WOOD.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOOD.L achieves a -5.32% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 16.77% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 4.61%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.26% annualized return.
WOOD.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -10.52%
- YTD
- -5.32%
- 1Y
- -6.67%
- 3Y*
- -2.38%
- 5Y*
- -2.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 1Y
- 30.62%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.55%
- 10Y*
- 25.26%
WOOD.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOOD.L iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -5.32% | -9.97% | -3.72% | 7.19% | -8.92% | 16.76% | 16.74% | 14.91% | -15.41% | 20.95% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.77% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOOD.L and IITU.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WOOD.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOOD.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
WOOD.L
IITU.L
WOOD.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WOOD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WOOD.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.25 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 1.82 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 4.40 | -4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WOOD.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOOD.L drawdown since its inception was -76.03%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -41.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOOD.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.03% | -41.09% | -34.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.56% | -16.76% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.68% | -28.03% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.40% | -28.03% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.38% | -28.03% | -14.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.38% | -8.00% | -17.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.50% | -8.09% | -20.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.27% | 6.94% | +3.33% |
Volatility
WOOD.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WOOD.L) is 5.07%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that WOOD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOOD.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 7.43% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 16.54% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 21.54% | -4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 26.39% | -9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 23.71% | -5.53% |
WOOD.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOOD.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
WOOD.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
WOOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WOOD.L iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.86% | 3.27% | 2.47% | 2.76% | 2.98% | 1.40% | 1.25% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 1.81% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WOOD.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WOOD.L.
WOOD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. WOOD.L tracks iShares Global Timber & Forestry UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WOOD.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for WOOD.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer