PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MINT.L vs. FLXK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MINT.L tracks the PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF while FLXK.L tracks the Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MINT.L returned 3.49%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for FLXK.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT.L achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 75.46% return.

MINT.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.39%
6M
2.17%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
2.65%

FLXK.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
-19.56%
6M
57.13%
YTD
75.46%
1Y
141.50%
3Y*
39.45%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF		2.39%4.66%5.75%5.72%-0.67%-0.09%1.30%1.59%
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF		75.46%94.79%-21.63%20.77%-28.01%-6.85%47.31%13.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT.L and FLXK.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.03

The correlation between MINT.L and FLXK.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF

Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MINT.L
MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
FLXK.L
FLXK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MINT.LFLXK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
7.86
3.14

+4.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
16.90
3.28

+13.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.57

1.47

+2.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

45.35

5.86

+39.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

232.26

18.40

+213.86

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.86, which is higher than the FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT.L and FLXK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT.L drawdown since its inception was -3.89%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT.L and FLXK.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MINT.LFLXK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-49.43%

+45.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-24.10%

+24.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.62%

-28.54%

+27.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.47%

-47.00%

+44.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.89%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-24.10%

+24.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-20.23%

+20.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

7.70%

-7.68%

Volatility

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) is 0.14%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 19.75%. This indicates that MINT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MINT.LFLXK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

19.75%

-19.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.35%

41.53%

-41.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58%

45.08%

-44.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.76%

29.63%

-28.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

29.61%

-28.66%

Dividends

MINT.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison

MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while FLXK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF		4.36%4.43%5.18%4.81%1.51%0.34%1.17%2.63%2.33%1.56%1.31%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

MINT.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF, while FLXK.L tracks Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Franklin.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINT.L and FLXK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer