MINT.L vs. USFR.L
MINT.L (PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and USFR.L (WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while USFR.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. MINT.L is actively managed, while USFR.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MINT.L returned 3.48%/yr vs 3.92%/yr for USFR.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINT.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.L.
Performance
MINT.L vs. USFR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINT.L achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than USFR.L's 3.00% return.
MINT.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
USFR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- —
MINT.L vs. USFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.37% | 4.66% | 5.75% | 5.72% | -0.67% | -0.09% | 1.30% | 2.32% |
USFR.L WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD | 3.00% | 4.17% | 5.46% | 4.95% | 2.06% | -0.16% | 0.58% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINT.L and USFR.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINT.L vs. USFR.L — Risk / Return Rank
MINT.L
USFR.L
MINT.L vs. USFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L) and WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MINT.L | USFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +13.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.53 | 1.80 | +1.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 45.23 | 3.83 | +41.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 230.58 | 41.62 | +188.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MINT.L vs. USFR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINT.L drawdown since its inception was -3.89%, which is greater than USFR.L's maximum drawdown of -2.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT.L and USFR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINT.L | USFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -2.99% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -1.26% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.62% | -1.75% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.47% | -1.75% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -0.09% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.12% | -0.10% |
Volatility
MINT.L vs. USFR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L) is 0.14%, while WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that MINT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINT.L | USFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | 0.89% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.36% | 1.20% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58% | 2.55% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.76% | 2.77% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 2.70% | -1.75% |
MINT.L vs. USFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINT.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINT.L vs. USFR.L - Dividend Comparison
MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than USFR.L's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.01% | 4.43% | 5.18% | 4.81% | 1.51% | 0.34% | 1.17% | 2.63% | 2.33% | 1.56% | 1.31% | 0.79% |
USFR.L WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD | 4.73% | 4.32% | 5.24% | 4.58% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINT.L and USFR.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFR.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFR.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINT.L.
MINT.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while USFR.L is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINT.L and 0.15% for USFR.L.
Find the right allocation for MINT.L and USFR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer