PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINO vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MINO vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MINO vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINO achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's -0.92% return.


MINO

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
0.32%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
10Y*

PYLD

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MINO vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MINO vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINO
MINO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MINO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MINO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINO vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINOPYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.72

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

2.39

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.84

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.75

7.60

-3.85

MINO vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINO Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINO and PYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINOPYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.72

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.99

-1.74

Correlation

The correlation between MINO and PYLD is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MINO vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

MINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than PYLD's 6.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
MINO
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
3.81%3.71%3.91%3.78%2.87%0.29%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.36%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MINO vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINO drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINO and PYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MINOPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

-4.52%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

-3.25%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-2.28%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-0.64%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

0.79%

+0.57%

Volatility

MINO vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) is 1.18%, while PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that MINO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MINOPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.61%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

2.12%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.67%

3.43%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.60%

4.00%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

4.00%

+0.60%