MINO vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MINO (PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MINO is actively managed, while IBMM is passively managed. MINO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.

Performance

MINO vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MINO

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 7.93%
• 3Y*: 4.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINO vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	0.86%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

MINO vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINO

MINO Risk / Return Rank: 81
MINO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MINO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MINO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MINO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MINO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINO vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MINO	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.48	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.84	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MINO	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	—	—

Drawdowns

MINO vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINO drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINO and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINO	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.24%	0.00%	-15.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	0.00%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.25%	0.00%	-4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MINO	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73%	0.00%	+2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.55%	0.00%	+4.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.55%	0.00%	+4.55%

MINO vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MINO vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

MINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	3.89%	3.71%	3.91%	3.78%	2.87%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MINO or IBMM?

On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MINO or IBMM?

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MINO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MINO or IBMM?

MINO has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between MINO and IBMM?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MINO and 0.18% for IBMM.