MINO vs. FMUN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN).

MINO and FMUN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MINO is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Sep 8, 2021. FMUN is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 11, 2019.

Performance

MINO vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MINO vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	0.32%	5.85%
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF	-0.40%	4.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINO achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than FMUN's -0.40% return.

MINO

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -1.83%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 4.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMUN

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINO vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio.

MINO

PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund

FMUN

Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF

Return for Risk

MINO vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINO

MINO Risk / Return Rank: 55
MINO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
MINO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MINO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
MINO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MINO Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINO vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MINO	FMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.75	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MINO	FMUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.95	-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between MINO and FMUN is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MINO vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison

MINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than FMUN's 3.25% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	3.81%	3.71%	3.91%	3.78%	2.87%	0.29%
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF	3.25%	2.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MINO vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINO drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, which is greater than FMUN's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINO and FMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINO	FMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.24%	-3.21%	-12.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-2.71%	+0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.38%	-0.67%	-3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MINO	FMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.67%	4.16%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.60%	4.16%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.60%	4.16%	+0.44%