MINN vs. SCMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB).
MINN and SCMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MINN is an actively managed fund by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Mar 11, 2021. SCMB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022.
Performance
MINN vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MINN vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINN Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF | -1.20% | 5.61% | 0.21% | 5.41% | 4.09% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | -0.51% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINN achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than SCMB's -0.51% return.
MINN
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- —
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MINN vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MINN vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
MINN
SCMB
MINN vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINN | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 1.22 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.05 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 2.98 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINN | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.90 | -0.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between MINN and SCMB is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MINN vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
MINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than SCMB's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINN Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF | 3.05% | 2.94% | 2.65% | 1.80% | 1.34% | 0.64% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.38% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MINN vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINN drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINN and SCMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINN | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.37% | -6.13% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.60% | -3.79% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.11% | -2.42% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -1.32% | -6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 1.34% | -0.22% |
Volatility
MINN vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) is 1.14%, while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that MINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MINN | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.19% | 2.02% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 4.15% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 4.22% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 4.22% | +0.82% |