MINN vs. GUMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI).
MINN and GUMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MINN is an actively managed fund by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Mar 11, 2021. GUMI is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 23, 2024.
Performance
MINN vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MINN vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MINN Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF | -0.97% | 5.61% | 0.70% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 0.67% | 3.39% | 1.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINN achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than GUMI's 0.67% return.
MINN
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.42%
- 10Y*
- —
GUMI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MINN vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MINN vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank
MINN
GUMI
MINN vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINN | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 2.82 | -2.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 4.39 | -3.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.62 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 6.88 | -5.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 29.42 | -25.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINN | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.82 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 3.32 | -3.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between MINN and GUMI is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MINN vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison
MINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than GUMI's 2.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINN Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF | 3.05% | 2.94% | 2.65% | 1.80% | 1.34% | 0.64% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.81% | 2.95% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MINN vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINN drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINN and GUMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINN | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.37% | -0.48% | -17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.60% | -0.48% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -0.04% | -3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -0.05% | -7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.11% | +1.02% |
Volatility
MINN vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) at 0.18%. This indicates that MINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MINN | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 0.18% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.19% | 0.75% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.99% | 1.15% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 1.01% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 1.01% | +4.03% |