MINN vs. MLN
MINN (Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF) and MLN (VanEck Long Muni ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MINN is actively managed, while MLN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MINN returned -0.78%/yr vs -1.42%/yr for MLN. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MINN charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for MLN.
Performance
MINN vs. MLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINN achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than MLN's 1.01% return.
MINN
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.44%
MLN
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- -1.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $356.88K | $256.88K | $189.68K | |
| $2.96M | $2.78M | $3.87M |
MINN vs. MLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINN Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF | -1.11% | 5.61% | 0.21% | 5.41% | -12.27% | 0.92% |
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF | 1.01% | 1.82% | 1.54% | 8.05% | -17.20% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINN and MLN is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MINN and MLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINN vs. MLN — Risk / Return Rank
MINN
MLN
MINN vs. MLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) and VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MINN | MLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.40 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.35 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 10.75 | -6.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MINN vs. MLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINN drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, smaller than the maximum MLN drawdown of -28.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINN and MLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINN | MLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.37% | -28.36% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.56% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.47% | -8.73% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.24% | -24.12% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -7.42% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -5.73% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.80% | +0.19% |
Volatility
MINN vs. MLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) is 1.07%, while VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that MINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINN | MLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.28% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 3.28% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 4.43% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 7.34% | -2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 8.88% | -3.94% |
MINN vs. MLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MLN's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MINN vs. MLN - Dividend Comparison
MINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than MLN's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINN Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF | 3.09% | 2.94% | 2.65% | 1.80% | 1.34% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF | 3.53% | 3.73% | 3.59% | 3.19% | 2.67% | 2.52% | 2.69% | 2.98% | 3.09% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 3.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINN and MLN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLN has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to MINN (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINN dropped -18.37% vs MLN's -28.36%.
On 5-year performance, MINN leads with -0.78% vs -1.42% for MLN. On fees, MLN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, MINN has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MINN has performed better with a -0.78% return vs -1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MINN.
MLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 3.09% for MINN.
They also come from different issuers: Mairs & Power and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MINN and 0.24% for MLN.
MLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MINN and MLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer