MINIX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
MINIX is managed by MFS. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
MINIX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MINIX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | -3.26% | 33.06% | 7.35% | 18.04% | -23.05% | 10.55% | 20.45% | 25.90% | -9.02% | 0.51% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINIX achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
MINIX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -11.89%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MINIX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MINIX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
MINIX
SWLGX
MINIX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 0.66 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.10 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.72 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 2.51 | +2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 0.66 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.68 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MINIX and SWLGX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MINIX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
MINIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | 8.03% | 7.77% | 12.02% | 11.21% | 13.90% | 7.25% | 5.25% | 3.94% | 4.49% | 2.62% | 1.82% | 3.20% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MINIX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINIX drawdown since its inception was -51.72%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINIX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.72% | -32.69% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -16.16% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.78% | -32.69% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.89% | -16.16% | +4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -7.13% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 4.62% | -1.49% |
Volatility
MINIX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that MINIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MINIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 5.38% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 11.82% | -1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 22.31% | -6.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 21.47% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 22.78% | -7.26% |