PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINDX vs. MGSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINDX vs. MGSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews India Fund (MINDX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINDX achieves a -13.54% return, which is significantly lower than MGSEX's 53.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MINDX has underperformed MGSEX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while MGSEX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.06% annualized return.


MINDX

1D
-0.81%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-13.54%
6M
-13.39%
1Y
-10.75%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
5.44%

MGSEX

1D
0.38%
1M
11.88%
YTD
53.60%
6M
57.44%
1Y
97.71%
3Y*
31.14%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
18.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINDX vs. MGSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINDX
Matthews India Fund
-13.54%1.61%9.99%23.14%-9.87%17.87%16.46%-0.79%-9.80%33.76%
MGSEX
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund
53.60%41.56%7.23%-4.82%-27.91%0.83%38.74%80.58%-3.77%20.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MINDX and MGSEX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2005

0.43

The correlation between MINDX and MGSEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINDX vs. MGSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINDX
MINDX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MGSEX
MGSEX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MGSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MGSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINDX vs. MGSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews India Fund (MINDX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINDXMGSEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.69

-0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

6.88

-7.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

23.18

-24.44

MINDX vs. MGSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the MGSEX Sharpe Ratio of 4.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINDX and MGSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINDXMGSEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

4.10

-4.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.43

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.70

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.52

-0.12

Drawdowns

MINDX vs. MGSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINDX drawdown since its inception was -72.18%, which is greater than MGSEX's maximum drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINDX and MGSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINDXMGSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.18%

-62.06%

-10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.96%

-14.34%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.51%

-19.30%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.51%

-43.13%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.46%

-45.32%

-3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.05%

0.00%

-21.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-13.88%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.59%

4.24%

+4.35%

Volatility

MINDX vs. MGSEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews India Fund (MINDX) is 5.28%, while AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that MINDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINDXMGSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

11.11%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

19.66%

-6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

24.07%

-8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

19.88%

-3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

25.96%

-8.53%

MINDX vs. MGSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINDX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MGSEX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINDX vs. MGSEX - Dividend Comparison

MINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than MGSEX's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGSEX
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund
0.09%0.14%0.47%0.11%0.00%83.77%4.35%59.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MINDX
Matthews India Fund
7.82%6.76%15.03%3.07%15.30%9.87%3.03%12.04%16.50%0.00%0.00%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINDX and MGSEX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGSEX has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to MINDX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINDX dropped -72.18% vs MGSEX's -62.06%.

MGSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.10 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINDX and MGSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer