MILN vs. SGRT
MILN (Global X Millennial Consumer ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MILN is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MILN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
MILN vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MILN achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
MILN
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- 1Y
- -10.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MILN vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MILN Global X Millennial Consumer ETF | -9.79% | -4.43% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MILN and SGRT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MILN vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
MILN
SGRT
MILN vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MILN | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MILN | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 3.81 | -3.29 |
Drawdowns
MILN vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MILN drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILN and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MILN | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -17.87% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.36% | 0.00% | -16.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -3.11% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.87% | — | — |
Volatility
MILN vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MILN | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.06% | 33.41% | -16.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 33.41% | -10.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 33.41% | -11.39% |
MILN vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MILN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MILN vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
MILN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MILN Global X Millennial Consumer ETF | 0.28% | 0.25% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.24% | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.43% | 0.89% | 0.32% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MILN and SGRT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MILN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MILN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
MILN has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MILN and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for MILN and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer