MILN vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MILN (Global X Millennial Consumer ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MILN is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MILN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

MILN vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MILN achieves a -4.59% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 30.03% return.

MILN

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 5.32%
• 6M: -7.09%
• YTD: -4.59%
• 1Y: -7.84%
• 3Y*: 10.68%
• 5Y*: 0.83%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

GARY

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -0.00%
• 6M: 22.99%
• YTD: 30.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MILN vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MILN Global X Millennial Consumer ETF	-4.59%	-0.15%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	30.03%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MILN and GARY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

MILN vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MILN

MILN Risk / Return Rank: 6
MILN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MILN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MILN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MILN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MILN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MILN vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MILN	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.72	—	—

Drawdowns

MILN vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MILN drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILN and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MILN	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.40%	-10.28%	-34.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.54%	-5.23%	-6.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.70%	-1.87%	-8.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MILN	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.80%	21.84%	-4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.77%	21.84%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.04%	21.84%	+0.20%

MILN vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MILN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

MILN vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

MILN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MILN Global X Millennial Consumer ETF	0.31%	0.25%	0.22%	0.33%	0.24%	0.15%	0.21%	0.43%	0.43%	0.89%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MILN and GARY in my portfolio?

MILN and GARY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MILN or GARY?

On fees, MILN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MILN or GARY?

MILN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MILN or GARY?

MILN has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between MILN and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MILN and 0.77% for GARY.