MILK vs. FLDR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MILK (Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MILK is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index, while FLDR is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MILK returned 7.64% vs 4.64% for FLDR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MILK charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.

Performance

MILK vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MILK achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 1.62% return.

MILK

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.72%
• 1Y: 7.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLDR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 4.64%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MILK vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	2.37%	7.49%	-1.49%
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF	1.62%	5.41%	0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MILK and FLDR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024	0.61

The correlation between MILK and FLDR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MILK vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MILK

MILK Risk / Return Rank: 44
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FLDR

FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MILK vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MILK	FLDR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	5.75	-4.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	9.69	-7.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	2.65	-1.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	9.97	-7.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	67.93	-60.57

MILK vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MILK Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 5.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MILK and FLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MILK vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MILK drawdown since its inception was -6.16%, smaller than the maximum FLDR drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILK and FLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MILK	FLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-12.23%	+6.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.75%	-0.47%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.04%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-0.35%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.07%	+0.97%

Volatility

MILK vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.18%. This indicates that MILK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MILK	FLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	0.18%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.82%	0.60%	+3.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.16%	0.81%	+4.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.70%	1.21%	+5.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.70%	5.25%	+1.45%

MILK vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MILK has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MILK vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

MILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.03%, more than FLDR's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF	4.42%	4.66%	5.50%	5.28%	2.09%	0.51%	1.22%	2.69%	1.38%
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	7.03%	6.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MILK and FLDR in my portfolio?

MILK and FLDR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MILK or FLDR?

MILK has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to FLDR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MILK dropped -6.16% vs FLDR's -12.23%.

Which ETF is better, MILK or FLDR?

On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 7.64% vs 4.64% for FLDR. On fees, FLDR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MILK or FLDR?

Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MILK or FLDR?

FLDR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MILK or FLDR?

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.03%, compared with 4.42% for FLDR.

What is the main difference between MILK and FLDR?

MILK is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLDR is Short-Term Bond. MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MILK and 0.15% for FLDR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.75 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.