PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIGFX vs. MCSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIGFX vs. MCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIGFX achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than MCSIX's 19.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MIGFX has outperformed MCSIX with an annualized return of 14.10%, while MCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.41% annualized return.


MIGFX

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.57%
6M
-1.74%
YTD
-2.12%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
14.10%
ALL TIME*
7.41%

MCSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
6.13%
6M
13.05%
YTD
19.61%
1Y
33.79%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
7.41%
ALL TIME*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MIGFX vs. MCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
-2.12%9.97%27.25%24.13%-19.20%26.06%22.55%39.89%0.81%28.68%
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
19.61%18.47%5.08%-6.13%13.40%27.55%-0.02%7.79%-12.79%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MIGFX and MCSIX is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.21

The correlation between MIGFX and MCSIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIGFX vs. MCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIGFX
MIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MCSIX
MCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIGFX vs. MCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIGFXMCSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.37

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

2.65

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

8.39

-8.03

MIGFX vs. MCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the MCSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIGFX and MCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIGFX vs. MCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, roughly equal to the maximum MCSIX drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGFX and MCSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIGFXMCSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-64.20%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-12.69%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.68%

-12.69%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.67%

-37.61%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-37.61%

+5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.15%

-6.88%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-33.02%

+14.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

4.00%

+0.57%

Volatility

MIGFX vs. MCSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) is 3.27%, while MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that MIGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIGFXMCSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

4.40%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

13.07%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

16.37%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

34.61%

-16.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

26.02%

-7.82%

MIGFX vs. MCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIGFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIGFX vs. MCSIX - Dividend Comparison

MIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.83%, less than MCSIX's 13.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
13.41%16.04%3.30%2.21%27.42%56.01%0.88%1.87%3.50%3.14%0.61%0.47%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
10.83%11.39%17.15%4.11%4.49%10.47%7.43%7.39%10.76%6.87%5.12%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIGFX and MCSIX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCSIX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to MIGFX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIGFX dropped -61.83% vs MCSIX's -64.20%.

MCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIGFX and MCSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer