MIG vs. VCLT
MIG (VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - MIG tracks the MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI) while VCLT tracks the Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIG returned 0.97%/yr vs -1.78%/yr for VCLT. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
MIG vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIG achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than VCLT's 0.99% return.
MIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 7.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.31%
MIG vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF | 0.39% | 7.34% | 3.38% | 8.88% | -14.51% | -0.02% | 1.26% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.99% | 7.18% | -1.90% | 11.17% | -25.50% | -1.73% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIG and VCLT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MIG and VCLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIG vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
MIG
VCLT
MIG vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.47 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 3.62 | +1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 0.97 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | -0.14 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.39 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
MIG vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIG drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIG and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -34.31% | +13.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -5.25% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.61% | -13.03% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.98% | -34.31% | +13.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -14.36% | +13.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -8.16% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 2.13% | -1.10% |
Volatility
MIG vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) is 1.47%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that MIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 2.31% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 5.75% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26% | 7.92% | -3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 12.78% | -6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 12.84% | -6.62% |
MIG vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MIG vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
MIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than VCLT's 5.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF | 4.78% | 4.81% | 4.68% | 4.38% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.55% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MIG and VCLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VCLT has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to MIG (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIG dropped -20.98% vs VCLT's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, MIG leads with 0.97% vs -1.78% for VCLT. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MIG has performed better with a 0.97% return vs -1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MIG.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 4.78% for MIG.
MIG tracks MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI), while VCLT tracks Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MIG and 0.04% for VCLT.
MIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIG and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer