PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIG vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIG vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.39%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIG vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIG vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIG
MIG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

QCON
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIG vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIGQCONDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.24

MIG vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIGQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

Drawdowns

MIG vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIG drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIG and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIGQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

0.00%

-20.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

0.00%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

0.00%

-6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

Volatility

MIG vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIGQCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

0.00%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

0.00%

+6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

0.00%

+6.22%

MIG vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIG vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

MIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MIG
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF
4.78%4.81%4.68%4.38%3.06%2.15%0.18%
QCON
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MIG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

MIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MIG and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIG and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer