MIG vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MIG (VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI), while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. MIG is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, MIG returned 5.37% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

MIG vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIG achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.21% return.

MIG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: -0.01%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: 5.64%
• 5Y*: 0.97%
• 10Y*: —

ACLO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIG vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF	0.39%	7.34%	-0.43%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.21%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MIG and ACLO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024	0.00

The correlation between MIG and ACLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MIG vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIG

MIG Risk / Return Rank: 36
MIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MIG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MIG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIG vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIG	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	7.29	-6.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	14.85	-13.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	3.41	-2.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	19.90	-18.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	164.37	-159.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIG vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIG and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIG	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	7.29	-6.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	5.10	-4.96

Drawdowns

MIG vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIG drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIG and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIG	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.98%	-1.01%	-19.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.83%	-0.27%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	0.00%	-1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.81%	-0.05%	-6.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.03%	+1.00%

Volatility

MIG vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that MIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIG	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	0.14%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	0.57%	+2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.26%	0.73%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.35%	1.08%	+5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.22%	1.08%	+5.14%

MIG vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MIG and ACLO have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MIG vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

MIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.91%	4.87%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF	4.78%	4.81%	4.68%	4.38%	3.06%	2.15%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIG and ACLO in my portfolio?

MIG and ACLO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIG or ACLO?

MIG has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIG dropped -20.98% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, MIG or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, MIG leads with 5.37% vs 5.31% for ACLO. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MIG or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, MIG has performed better with a 5.37% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MIG or ACLO?

MIG and ACLO have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MIG or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 4.78% for MIG.

What is the main difference between MIG and ACLO?

MIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and TCW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.