MIELY vs. PWR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR (MIELY) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).

Performance

MIELY vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR (MIELY) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MIELY vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIELY Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR	11.84%	73.08%	21.33%	42.15%	-22.04%	-16.17%	11.35%	23.78%	-33.88%	21.11%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	32.75%	33.70%	46.60%	51.70%	24.63%	59.50%	77.74%	35.84%	-22.93%	12.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MIELY : $66.48B PWR : $84.96B
EPS MIELY : $364.28 PWR : $6.79
PE Ratio MIELY : 0.18 PWR : 82.44
PEG Ratio MIELY : 0.01 PWR : 4.08
PS Ratio MIELY : 0.01 PWR : 2.99
PB Ratio MIELY : 0.02 PWR : 9.51
Total Revenue (TTM) MIELY : $5.70T PWR : $28.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) MIELY : $1.86T PWR : $3.69B
EBITDA (TTM) MIELY : $649.29B PWR : $2.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIELY achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 32.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MIELY has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 12.81%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 38.21% annualized return.

MIELY

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: -14.86%
• YTD: 11.84%
• 6M: 26.55%
• 1Y: 76.18%
• 3Y*: 40.65%
• 5Y*: 16.66%
• 10Y*: 12.81%

PWR

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 32.75%
• 6M: 33.19%
• 1Y: 117.43%
• 3Y*: 50.01%
• 5Y*: 44.67%
• 10Y*: 38.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MIELY vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIELY

MIELY Risk / Return Rank: 91
MIELY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MIELY Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MIELY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MIELY Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
MIELY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIELY vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR (MIELY) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIELY	PWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	3.32	-1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.85	-0.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.52	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	10.34	-6.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.28	25.41	-10.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIELY vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIELY Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIELY and PWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIELY	PWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	3.32	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	1.30	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	1.15	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.34	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between MIELY and PWR is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MIELY vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

MIELY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MIELY Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR	0.00%	0.72%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.98%	1.76%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.07%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MIELY vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIELY drawdown since its inception was -89.09%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIELY and PWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIELY	PWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.09%	-97.07%	+7.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.08%	-11.66%	-7.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.41%	-33.89%	-13.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.76%	-45.53%	-10.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.95%	-3.17%	-43.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.78%	-47.14%	-22.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	4.75%	+0.18%

Volatility

MIELY vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR (MIELY) has a higher volatility of 13.30% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 11.33%. This indicates that MIELY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIELY	PWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.30%	11.33%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.72%	26.47%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.87%	35.59%	-0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	34.67%	-4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.57%	33.20%	-4.63%

Financials

MIELY vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MIELY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 531.01B and revenue of 1.45T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 985.00M and revenue of 7.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

MIELY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR reported an operating income of 140.77B and revenue of 1.45T, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.00M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

MIELY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR reported a net income of 110.83B and revenue of 1.45T, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 315.50M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.