PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDLX vs. FSISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDLX vs. FSISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and Fidelity SAI International Small Cap Index Fund (FSISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDLX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than FSISX's 10.30% return.


MIDLX

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.95%
6M
7.96%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
6.86%

FSISX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.87%
YTD
10.30%
6M
13.47%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDLX vs. FSISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
6.95%17.03%3.33%13.21%-18.52%0.38%
FSISX
Fidelity SAI International Small Cap Index Fund
10.30%32.61%1.74%13.23%-21.18%-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDLX and FSISX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2021

0.93

The correlation between MIDLX and FSISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDLX vs. FSISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDLX
MIDLX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MIDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FSISX
FSISX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FSISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FSISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDLX vs. FSISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and Fidelity SAI International Small Cap Index Fund (FSISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDLXFSISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.33

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.10

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.17

7.81

-4.64

MIDLX vs. FSISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the FSISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDLX and FSISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDLXFSISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.82

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.35

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.36

+0.23

Drawdowns

MIDLX vs. FSISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDLX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum FSISX drawdown of -36.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDLX and FSISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDLXFSISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-36.84%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.75%

-11.73%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-14.75%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.58%

-36.84%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-1.29%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-13.12%

+6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.14%

+0.27%

Volatility

MIDLX vs. FSISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) is 3.48%, while Fidelity SAI International Small Cap Index Fund (FSISX) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that MIDLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDLXFSISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.73%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

10.86%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

13.52%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

15.90%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.01%

15.89%

-1.88%

MIDLX vs. FSISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FSISX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDLX vs. FSISX - Dividend Comparison

MIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than FSISX's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSISX
Fidelity SAI International Small Cap Index Fund
3.35%3.70%3.33%3.13%3.02%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
3.15%3.37%10.08%4.21%5.85%5.19%4.03%4.36%6.82%1.63%1.09%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MIDLX and FSISX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSISX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to MIDLX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDLX dropped -34.70% vs FSISX's -36.84%.

FSISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDLX and FSISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer