MIDE vs. DBO
MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MIDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIDE returned 8.38%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for DBO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIDE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
MIDE vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
MIDE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
MIDE vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 14.80% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 15.20% | -11.63% | 11.77% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 24.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDE and DBO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.13 |
The correlation between MIDE and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MIDE vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIDE
DBO
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
MIDE
DBO
-
Financial Services
MIDE
DBO
Technology
MIDE
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
MIDE
DBO
-
Healthcare
MIDE
DBO
-
Real Estate
MIDE
DBO
-
Energy
MIDE
DBO
-
Basic Materials
MIDE
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
MIDE
DBO
-
Utilities
MIDE
DBO
-
Communication Services
MIDE
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDE vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
MIDE
DBO
MIDE vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDE | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 4.28 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 8.69 | +2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDE | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.25 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.02 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
MIDE vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDE | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -90.18% | +65.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -18.19% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.59% | -28.20% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | -37.68% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.68% | +52.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -62.25% | +55.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 8.94% | -6.32% |
Volatility
MIDE vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) is 4.40%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that MIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDE | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 12.79% | -8.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 28.32% | -16.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 34.58% | -18.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 32.31% | -12.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 31.79% | -12.12% |
MIDE vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIDE vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.31% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDE and DBO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to MIDE (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.36% vs 8.38% for MIDE. On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MIDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.31% for MIDE.
MIDE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDE and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer