MIDE vs. CTEF
MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. MIDE is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIDE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
MIDE vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.
MIDE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIDE vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 14.45% | 12.33% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.35% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDE and CTEF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDE vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
MIDE
CTEF
MIDE vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDE | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDE | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 3.54 | -3.07 |
Drawdowns
MIDE vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDE | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -15.00% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.41% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -1.80% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | — | — |
Volatility
MIDE vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDE | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 21.81% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 21.81% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 21.81% | -2.14% |
MIDE vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIDE vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.31% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDE and CTEF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
MIDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for MIDE and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer