PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDE vs. CTEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDE vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.


MIDE

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.36%
YTD
14.45%
6M
14.97%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*

CTEF

1D
-0.41%
1M
10.65%
YTD
29.35%
6M
31.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDE vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
14.45%12.33%
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
29.35%33.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDE and CTEF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDE vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDE
MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CTEF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDE vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDECTEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

MIDE vs. CTEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDECTEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

3.54

-3.07

Drawdowns

MIDE vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and CTEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDECTEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.59%

-15.00%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.41%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-1.80%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

Volatility

MIDE vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDECTEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

21.81%

-5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

21.81%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

21.81%

-2.14%

MIDE vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDE vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison

MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
0.06%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
1.31%1.52%1.45%1.36%1.33%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDE and CTEF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.

MIDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.45% for CTEF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDE and CTEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer