MIDD.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MIDD.L (iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - MIDD.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MIDD.L returned 5.54%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIDD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDD.L achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDD.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 5.54%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.

MIDD.L

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 6M: 7.17%
• 1Y: 13.79%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: 5.54%

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 8.13%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 17.12%
• 1Y: 29.56%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIDD.L iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF	5.26%	12.44%	7.33%	7.76%	-17.86%	16.27%	-5.34%	28.46%	-13.44%	17.34%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	15.89%	25.71%	1.42%	14.39%	-5.30%	13.03%	4.59%	19.05%	-11.56%	17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDD.L and CMU.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011	0.63

The correlation between MIDD.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MIDD.L	CMU.L
Industrials	19.9%	15.7%
Financial Services	19.5%	21.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	10.1%
Real Estate	9.4%	1.3%
Technology	9.2%	30.8%
Basic Materials	6.6%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	5.2%
Communication Services	5.9%	2.3%
Healthcare	4.4%	4.2%
Utilities	3.0%	5.8%
Energy	2.5%	0.0%

Return for Risk

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDD.L

MIDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
MIDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
MIDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MIDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MIDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MIDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIDD.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.98	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.79	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.37	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	2.58	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	9.67	-5.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDD.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIDD.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.98	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.66	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.65	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.49	-0.01

Drawdowns

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDD.L drawdown since its inception was -51.66%, which is greater than CMU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDD.L and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIDD.L	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.66%	-32.53%	-19.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-11.43%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-11.95%	-4.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.93%	-21.11%	-8.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.60%	-31.41%	-10.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.18%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-5.80%	-2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	3.05%	+0.23%

Volatility

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) is 3.92%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that MIDD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIDD.L	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	5.34%	-1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	12.44%	-2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.49%	14.86%	-2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.27%	16.00%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	16.78%	-0.24%

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIDD.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

MIDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MIDD.L iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF	3.43%	3.56%	3.05%	3.17%	2.76%	2.01%	1.51%	2.72%	3.07%	2.80%	2.67%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIDD.L and CMU.L in my portfolio?

MIDD.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MIDD.L or CMU.L?

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MIDD.L or CMU.L?

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MIDD.L.

What is the main difference between MIDD.L and CMU.L?

MIDD.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MIDD.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.