MID vs. XMMO
MID (American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. MID is actively managed, while XMMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MID returned 6.25%/yr vs 16.69%/yr for XMMO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MID charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
MID vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MID achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.
MID
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
MID vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF | 5.47% | 8.22% | 19.40% | 22.20% | -27.44% | 10.39% | 29.63% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 27.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MID and XMMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between MID and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
MID vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MID
XMMO
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
MID
XMMO
Technology
MID
XMMO
Healthcare
MID
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
MID
XMMO
Energy
MID
XMMO
Financial Services
MID
XMMO
Utilities
MID
XMMO
Basic Materials
MID
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
MID
XMMO
Communication Services
MID
-
XMMO
Real Estate
MID
-
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MID vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
MID
XMMO
MID vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MID | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.35 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 4.45 | -3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 18.21 | -16.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MID | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 1.99 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.78 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.58 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
MID vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MID drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MID and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MID | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.15% | -55.37% | +15.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -8.34% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.92% | -24.93% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.15% | -27.91% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | 0.00% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.44% | -9.45% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 2.04% | +2.62% |
Volatility
MID vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) is 4.88%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that MID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MID | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 7.82% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 15.54% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.73% | 18.71% | -1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 21.45% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 22.27% | +1.65% |
MID vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MID vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
MID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MID and XMMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to MID (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MID dropped -40.15% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 16.69% vs 6.25% for MID. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MID has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MID.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.15% for MID.
MID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MID and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MID and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer