PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MID vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MID vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MID achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.


MID

1D
-0.48%
1M
3.85%
YTD
5.47%
6M
2.66%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MID vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MID
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
5.47%8.22%19.40%22.20%-27.44%10.39%29.63%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MID and XMMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020

0.80

The correlation between MID and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

MID vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MID
XMMO

Industrials

25.5%
41.1%

Technology

21.9%
16.7%

Healthcare

18.7%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
4.6%

Energy

7.3%
7.7%

Financial Services

6.1%
2.4%

Utilities

4.4%
5.8%

Basic Materials

2.3%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
0.5%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Industrials

MID
25.5%
XMMO
41.1%

Technology

MID
21.9%
XMMO
16.7%

Healthcare

MID
18.7%
XMMO
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MID
12.2%
XMMO
4.6%

Energy

MID
7.3%
XMMO
7.7%

Financial Services

MID
6.1%
XMMO
2.4%

Utilities

MID
4.4%
XMMO
5.8%

Basic Materials

MID
2.3%
XMMO
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

MID
1.6%
XMMO
0.5%

Communication Services

MID

-

XMMO
1.6%

Real Estate

MID

-

XMMO
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MID vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MID
MID Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MID Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MID Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MID Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MID vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.35

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

4.45

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.45

18.21

-16.76

MID vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MID Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MID and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

1.99

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.78

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.58

-0.17

Drawdowns

MID vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MID drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MID and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-55.37%

+15.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-8.34%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.92%

-24.93%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.15%

-27.91%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.44%

-9.45%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

2.04%

+2.62%

Volatility

MID vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) is 4.88%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that MID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

7.82%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

15.54%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

18.71%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

21.45%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

22.27%

+1.65%

MID vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MID vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

MID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MID
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
0.15%0.18%0.17%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MID and XMMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to MID (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MID dropped -40.15% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 16.69% vs 6.25% for MID. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MID has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MID.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.15% for MID.

MID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MID and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MID and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer