MID vs. IPO
MID (American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF) and IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. MID is actively managed, while IPO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MID returned 4.34%/yr vs -1.92%/yr for IPO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MID charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IPO.
Performance
MID vs. IPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MID achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly lower than IPO's 29.28% return.
MID
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
IPO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 36.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
MID vs. IPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF | 3.69% | 8.22% | 19.40% | 22.20% | -27.44% | 10.39% | 30.35% |
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 29.28% | 5.45% | 15.68% | 52.55% | -57.26% | -10.31% | 51.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MID and IPO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MID and IPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MID vs. IPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MID
IPO
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
MID
IPO
Technology
MID
IPO
Healthcare
MID
IPO
Consumer Cyclical
MID
IPO
Energy
MID
IPO
Financial Services
MID
IPO
Utilities
MID
IPO
Basic Materials
MID
IPO
-
Consumer Defensive
MID
IPO
Communication Services
MID
-
IPO
Real Estate
MID
-
IPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MID vs. IPO — Risk / Return Rank
MID
IPO
MID vs. IPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MID | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.21 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.39 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 3.10 | -1.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MID vs. IPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MID drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum IPO drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MID and IPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MID | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.15% | -68.76% | +28.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -26.24% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.92% | -32.04% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.15% | -66.02% | +25.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -21.89% | +19.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -22.93% | +9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 11.72% | -7.00% |
Volatility
MID vs. IPO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) is 6.50%, while Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that MID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MID | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 10.97% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 23.55% | -9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 30.18% | -12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 36.06% | -12.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 31.62% | -7.69% |
MID vs. IPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IPO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MID vs. IPO - Dividend Comparison
MID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than IPO's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.11% |
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MID and IPO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPO has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to MID (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MID dropped -40.15% vs IPO's -68.76%.
On 5-year performance, MID leads with 4.34% vs -1.92% for IPO. On fees, MID is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MID has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MID has performed better with a 4.34% return vs -1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MID is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.
IPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.18% for MID.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MID and 0.60% for IPO.
IPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MID and IPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer