MIAGX vs. CSTAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX).
MIAGX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jun 27, 2002. CSTAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Sep 13, 2012.
Performance
MIAGX vs. CSTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIAGX vs. CSTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIAGX MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund | -3.67% | 15.20% | 12.11% | 16.29% | -16.94% | 19.16% | 15.81% | 29.98% | -6.72% | 23.23% |
CSTAX American Funds College 2027 Fund | -0.65% | 9.00% | 5.57% | 6.57% | -9.87% | 6.52% | 7.66% | 13.35% | -2.23% | 11.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIAGX achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly lower than CSTAX's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, MIAGX has outperformed CSTAX with an annualized return of 10.18%, while CSTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.
MIAGX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 10.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
CSTAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIAGX vs. CSTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIAGX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CSTAX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIAGX vs. CSTAX — Risk / Return Rank
MIAGX
CSTAX
MIAGX vs. CSTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIAGX | CSTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.73 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 2.47 | -1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.35 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 2.23 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 9.16 | -5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIAGX | CSTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.73 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.57 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.86 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.86 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIAGX and CSTAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIAGX vs. CSTAX - Dividend Comparison
MIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than CSTAX's 5.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIAGX MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund | 8.12% | 7.82% | 5.16% | 3.41% | 4.49% | 6.84% | 3.69% | 4.80% | 6.06% | 4.25% | 3.12% | 5.45% |
CSTAX American Funds College 2027 Fund | 5.30% | 5.26% | 3.78% | 3.17% | 3.40% | 7.52% | 5.72% | 4.00% | 4.78% | 3.90% | 4.34% | 4.49% |
Drawdowns
MIAGX vs. CSTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIAGX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than CSTAX's maximum drawdown of -14.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIAGX and CSTAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIAGX | CSTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.00% | -14.52% | -40.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -2.72% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.51% | -14.52% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.78% | -14.52% | -18.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.65% | -2.48% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -2.37% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 0.66% | +1.76% |
Volatility
MIAGX vs. CSTAX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX) at 1.32%. This indicates that MIAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIAGX | CSTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 1.32% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.07% | 2.05% | +6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 3.47% | +11.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 5.16% | +9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 5.82% | +9.60% |