MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MHL.DE (S&P Global Inc) is a stock, while VFEM.DE (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Over the past 5 years, MHL.DE returned 3.86%/yr vs 6.01%/yr for VFEM.DE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHL.DE achieves a -18.97% return, which is significantly lower than VFEM.DE's 12.66% return.

MHL.DE

• 1D: 3.41%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: -18.97%
• 6M: -14.84%
• 1Y: -18.96%
• 3Y*: 1.85%
• 5Y*: 3.86%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

VFEM.DE

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 12.66%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 26.20%
• 3Y*: 15.05%
• 5Y*: 6.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MHL.DE S&P Global Inc	-18.97%	-5.99%	22.36%	26.77%	-24.06%	63.32%	4.55%	66.10%	4.63%	11.58%
VFEM.DE Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing	12.66%	11.40%	19.82%	3.29%	-11.02%	6.34%	3.56%	23.57%	-9.32%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MHL.DE and VFEM.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017	0.19

The correlation between MHL.DE and VFEM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHL.DE

MHL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 14
MHL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MHL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MHL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MHL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MHL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

VFEM.DE

VFEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
VFEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
VFEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
VFEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VFEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VFEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MHL.DE	VFEM.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	1.80	-2.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	2.57	-3.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.32	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	3.11	-3.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	10.36	-11.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the VFEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHL.DE and VFEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MHL.DE	VFEM.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.73	1.80	-2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.37	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	0.36	+0.91

Drawdowns

MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHL.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.25%, which is greater than VFEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHL.DE and VFEM.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	MHL.DE	VFEM.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.25%	-31.59%	-5.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.65%	-8.49%	-24.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.25%	-18.56%	-18.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.25%	-20.11%	-17.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.42%	-1.73%	-27.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.32%	-8.24%	-2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.66%	2.55%	+13.11%

Volatility

MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE) at 5.44%. This indicates that MHL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MHL.DE	VFEM.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.50%	5.44%	+4.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.12%	11.70%	+11.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.33%	14.69%	+11.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	15.93%	+9.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.11%	18.20%	+14.91%

Dividends

MHL.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

MHL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than VFEM.DE's 2.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MHL.DE S&P Global Inc	0.78%	0.65%	0.77%	0.72%	0.85%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFEM.DE Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing	2.04%	2.39%	2.28%	2.66%	3.38%	2.26%	1.93%	2.32%	2.79%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MHL.DE and VFEM.DE in my portfolio?

MHL.DE and VFEM.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.