PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHL.DE achieves a -18.97% return, which is significantly lower than AMEL.DE's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MHL.DE has outperformed AMEL.DE with an annualized return of 14.70%, while AMEL.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.43% annualized return.


MHL.DE

1D
3.41%
1M
1.09%
YTD
-18.97%
6M
-14.45%
1Y
-19.02%
3Y*
1.85%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
14.70%

AMEL.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
10.83%
6M
8.65%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHL.DE
S&P Global Inc
-18.97%-5.99%22.36%26.77%-24.06%63.32%4.55%66.10%4.63%34.99%
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
10.83%38.06%-22.22%28.09%16.34%-3.21%-21.29%20.69%-3.27%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MHL.DE and AMEL.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011

0.10

The correlation between MHL.DE and AMEL.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHL.DE
MHL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MHL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MHL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHL.DEAMEL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.33

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

3.16

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

9.66

-10.88

MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHL.DE and AMEL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHL.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

1.90

-2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.45

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.29

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.12

+1.15

Drawdowns

MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHL.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.25%, smaller than the maximum AMEL.DE drawdown of -52.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHL.DE and AMEL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHL.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.25%

-52.69%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.65%

-10.86%

-21.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

-25.38%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.25%

-25.38%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.25%

-51.31%

+14.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.42%

-10.86%

-18.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.32%

-17.89%

+7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.66%

3.57%

+12.09%

Volatility

MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison

S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) at 5.32%. This indicates that MHL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHL.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

5.32%

+4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.12%

15.30%

+7.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.33%

18.10%

+8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.09%

20.90%

+4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.11%

25.27%

+7.84%

Dividends

MHL.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison

MHL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while AMEL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MHL.DE
S&P Global Inc
0.78%0.65%0.77%0.72%0.85%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHL.DE and AMEL.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHL.DE and AMEL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer