PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHITX vs. FAGOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHITX vs. FAGOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS High Income Fund (MHITX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHITX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FAGOX's 14.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MHITX has underperformed FAGOX with an annualized return of 4.41%, while FAGOX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return.


MHITX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.20%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
4.41%

FAGOX

1D
-1.23%
1M
2.68%
YTD
14.98%
6M
13.77%
1Y
34.64%
3Y*
30.37%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
22.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHITX vs. FAGOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHITX
MFS High Income Fund
0.66%8.72%5.56%11.12%-11.60%3.20%4.49%14.48%-3.28%6.20%
FAGOX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M
14.98%21.86%38.37%44.80%-38.56%11.05%68.19%39.94%14.61%34.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MHITX and FAGOX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1987

0.25

The correlation between MHITX and FAGOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHITX vs. FAGOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHITX
MHITX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MHITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHITX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MHITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHITX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FAGOX
FAGOX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FAGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHITX vs. FAGOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS High Income Fund (MHITX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MHITXFAGOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.22

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

8.14

+2.99

MHITX vs. FAGOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FAGOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHITX and FAGOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MHITX vs. FAGOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHITX drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, smaller than the maximum FAGOX drawdown of -65.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHITX and FAGOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHITXFAGOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.76%

-65.31%

+18.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-16.27%

+13.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.88%

-26.64%

+22.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-44.84%

+28.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.29%

-44.84%

+25.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.47%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-13.54%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

4.44%

-3.90%

Volatility

MHITX vs. FAGOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS High Income Fund (MHITX) is 0.95%, while Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that MHITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAGOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHITXFAGOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

8.30%

-7.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

15.83%

-13.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76%

19.75%

-15.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

25.05%

-19.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.61%

24.01%

-18.40%

MHITX vs. FAGOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHITX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than FAGOX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHITX vs. FAGOX - Dividend Comparison

MHITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than FAGOX's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAGOX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M
3.66%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.01%5.29%4.15%12.10%7.48%15.51%11.14%
MHITX
MFS High Income Fund
6.24%6.04%5.07%4.68%4.07%4.34%4.49%4.65%5.06%4.85%5.39%6.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHITX and FAGOX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAGOX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to MHITX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHITX dropped -46.76% vs FAGOX's -65.31%.

FAGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHITX and FAGOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer