MHIP vs. CNCR

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

MHIP (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. MHIP is actively managed, while CNCR is passively managed. MHIP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.

Performance

MHIP vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MHIP

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.51%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHIP vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF	1.64%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

MHIP vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

MHIP vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHIP drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHIP and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MHIP	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.09%	0.00%	-3.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	0.00%	-1.28%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MHIP	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	0.00%	+11.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.86%	0.00%	+11.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.86%	0.00%	+11.86%

MHIP vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHIP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MHIP vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

Neither MHIP nor CNCR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MHIP or CNCR?

On fees, MHIP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MHIP or CNCR?

MHIP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MHIP or CNCR?

MHIP and CNCR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MHIP and CNCR?

They also come from different issuers: Milliman and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MHIP and 0.79% for CNCR.