MHIG vs. TOAK
MHIG (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF) and TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) are both Multistrategy funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MHIG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TOAK.
Performance
MHIG vs. TOAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MHIG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TOAK
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $288.37 | $336.43 | $1.73K | |
| $482.15K | $330.21K | $391.88K |
MHIG vs. TOAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MHIG Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF | -2.45% |
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MHIG and TOAK is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MHIG vs. TOAK — Risk / Return Rank
MHIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TOAK
MHIG vs. TOAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF (MHIG) and Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MHIG | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.64 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MHIG vs. TOAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MHIG drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, which is greater than TOAK's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHIG and TOAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MHIG | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -1.81% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -1.19% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -0.20% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.71% | — |
Volatility
MHIG vs. TOAK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MHIG | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.48% | 3.13% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 2.28% | +5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 2.28% | +5.20% |
MHIG vs. TOAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MHIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TOAK's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MHIG vs. TOAK - Dividend Comparison
Neither MHIG nor TOAK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MHIG and TOAK have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MHIG.
MHIG and TOAK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Milliman and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MHIG and 0.25% for TOAK.
Find the right allocation for MHIG and TOAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer