MHIG vs. HF
MHIG (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF) and HF (DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF) are both Multistrategy funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MHIG charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for HF.
Performance
MHIG vs. HF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MHIG
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HF
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MHIG vs. HF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MHIG Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF | -1.62% |
HF DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MHIG and HF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MHIG vs. HF — Risk / Return Rank
MHIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HF
MHIG vs. HF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF (MHIG) and DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF (HF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MHIG | HF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MHIG vs. HF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MHIG drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum HF drawdown of -5.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHIG and HF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MHIG | HF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -5.94% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -0.28% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -1.62% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility
MHIG vs. HF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MHIG | HF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.18% | 5.63% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 6.37% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 6.37% | +1.81% |
MHIG vs. HF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MHIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HF's 1.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MHIG vs. HF - Dividend Comparison
MHIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HF DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF | 0.89% | 0.94% | 11.18% | 2.49% |
MHIG Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MHIG and HF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MHIG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MHIG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for HF.
HF has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for MHIG.
They also come from different issuers: Milliman and Days Global Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MHIG and 1.70% for HF.
Find the right allocation for MHIG and HF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer