MH vs. LRN
MH (McGraw Hill, Inc) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Education & Training Services industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MH vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MH achieves a -26.00% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 54.03% return.
MH
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- -26.00%
- 6M
- -27.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRN
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- 54.03%
- 6M
- 59.56%
- 1Y
- -30.88%
- 3Y*
- 33.47%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 23.57%
MH vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MH McGraw Hill, Inc | -26.00% | -2.94% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 54.03% | -49.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MH and LRN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
MH:
-$0.56
LRN:
$9.68
MH:
0.74
LRN:
1.91
MH:
$2.11B
LRN:
$2.54B
MH:
$1.71B
LRN:
$972.24M
MH:
$574.43M
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MH vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
MH
LRN
MH vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.15 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
MH vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MH drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MH and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -81.41% | +43.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -64.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -64.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.13% | -41.10% | +8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -36.28% | +15.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 41.69% | — |
Volatility
MH vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.94% | 66.64% | -7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.94% | 51.37% | +7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.94% | 49.21% | +9.73% |
Dividends
MH vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither MH nor LRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MH vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McGraw Hill, Inc and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MH vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
MH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a gross profit of 370.32M and revenue of 434.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.3%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
MH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported an operating income of 30.39M and revenue of 434.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
MH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a net income of -20.20M and revenue of 434.16M, resulting in a net margin of -4.7%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MH and LRN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MH and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer