MH vs. LRN
Compare and contrast key facts about McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) and Stride, Inc. (LRN).
Performance
MH vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MH vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MH McGraw Hill, Inc | -16.97% | -2.94% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 35.79% | -49.75% |
Fundamentals
MH:
-$0.56
LRN:
$6.50
MH:
0.83
LRN:
1.72
MH:
$2.11B
LRN:
$2.52B
MH:
$1.71B
LRN:
$989.96M
MH:
$574.43M
LRN:
$546.48M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MH achieves a -16.97% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 35.79% return.
MH
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -16.97%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRN
- 1D
- 4.75%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 35.79%
- 6M
- -40.80%
- 1Y
- -30.30%
- 3Y*
- 30.97%
- 5Y*
- 22.66%
- 10Y*
- 24.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MH vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
MH
LRN
MH vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.14 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between MH and LRN is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MH vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither MH nor LRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MH vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MH drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MH and LRN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.06% | -81.41% | +45.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -64.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.85% | -48.08% | +24.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -36.19% | +18.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.34% | — |
Volatility
MH vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 82.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.10% | 67.92% | -6.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.10% | 51.56% | +9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.10% | 49.72% | +11.38% |
Financials
MH vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McGraw Hill, Inc and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MH vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
MH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a gross profit of 370.32M and revenue of 434.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.3%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 259.63M and revenue of 631.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.
MH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported an operating income of 30.39M and revenue of 434.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.85M and revenue of 631.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.3%.
MH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a net income of -20.20M and revenue of 434.16M, resulting in a net margin of -4.7%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 99.48M and revenue of 631.26M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.