MH vs. LRN
MH (McGraw Hill, Inc) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Education & Training Services industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past year, MH returned -28.46% vs -37.88% for LRN. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MH vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MH achieves a -33.58% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 23.66% return.
MH
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- 6M
- -25.69%
- YTD
- -33.58%
- 1Y
- -28.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.01%
LRN
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- -11.22%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 23.66%
- 1Y
- -37.88%
- 3Y*
- 27.37%
- 5Y*
- 21.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | $85.91M | $73.02M | $72.52M |
| $5.74M | $6.72M | $7.58M |
MH vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MH McGraw Hill, Inc | -33.58% | -2.94% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 23.66% | -50.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between MH and LRN is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.36 |
Fundamentals
MH:
$2.10B
LRN:
$3.41B
MH:
$0.28
LRN:
$9.77
MH:
39.51
LRN:
8.22
MH:
0.66
LRN:
1.52
MH:
$2.10B
LRN:
$2.54B
MH:
$1.70B
LRN:
$972.24M
MH:
$518.59M
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MH vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
MH
LRN
MH vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.95 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.59 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -0.82 | -0.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MH vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MH drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MH and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -81.41% | +31.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.42% | -64.07% | +14.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -64.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.08% | -52.72% | +13.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.82% | -36.36% | +12.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.16% | 45.54% | -19.38% |
Volatility
MH vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) is 16.37%, while Stride, Inc. (LRN) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that MH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MH | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.37% | 21.03% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.49% | 32.25% | +10.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.18% | 70.91% | -9.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.65% | 51.90% | +8.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.65% | 49.67% | +10.98% |
Dividends
MH vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither MH nor LRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MH vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McGraw Hill, Inc and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MH vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
MH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a gross profit of 388.89M and revenue of 463.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.9%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
MH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported an operating income of -6.36M and revenue of 463.72M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
MH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a net income of -50.27M and revenue of 463.72M, resulting in a net margin of -10.8%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MH and LRN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRN has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to MH (16.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MH dropped -49.42% vs LRN's -81.41%.
MH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MH and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer