MH vs. EDU
MH (McGraw Hill, Inc) and EDU (New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Education & Training Services industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past year, MH returned -28.46% vs 34.98% for EDU. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MH vs. EDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MH achieves a -33.58% return, which is significantly lower than EDU's 8.27% return.
MH
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- 6M
- -25.69%
- YTD
- -33.58%
- 1Y
- -28.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.01%
EDU
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 25.22%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 22.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $57.02M | $45.84M | $34.02M | |
| $5.74M | $6.72M | $7.58M |
MH vs. EDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MH McGraw Hill, Inc | -33.58% | -2.94% |
EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 8.27% | 16.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MH and EDU is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
MH:
$2.10B
EDU:
$9.30B
MH:
$0.28
EDU:
$2.63
MH:
39.51
EDU:
22.35
MH:
0.66
EDU:
1.75
MH:
$2.10B
EDU:
$5.39B
MH:
$1.70B
EDU:
$2.96B
MH:
$518.59M
EDU:
$716.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MH vs. EDU — Risk / Return Rank
MH
EDU
MH vs. EDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MH | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.20 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 1.26 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 2.68 | -3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MH vs. EDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MH drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum EDU drawdown of -95.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MH and EDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MH | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -95.61% | +46.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.42% | -29.21% | -20.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -65.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.08% | -69.07% | +29.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.82% | -33.31% | +9.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.16% | 13.72% | +12.44% |
Volatility
MH vs. EDU - Volatility Comparison
McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) have volatilities of 16.37% and 16.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MH | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.37% | 16.05% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.49% | 26.88% | +15.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.18% | 37.29% | +23.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.65% | 64.08% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.65% | 59.76% | +0.89% |
Dividends
MH vs. EDU - Dividend Comparison
MH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 2.04% | 1.09% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 1.28% |
MH McGraw Hill, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MH vs. EDU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McGraw Hill, Inc and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MH vs. EDU - Profitability Comparison
MH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a gross profit of 388.89M and revenue of 463.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.9%.
EDU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 766.52M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.
MH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported an operating income of -6.36M and revenue of 463.72M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.
EDU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported an operating income of 181.59M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
MH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a net income of -50.27M and revenue of 463.72M, resulting in a net margin of -10.8%.
EDU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported a net income of 127.71M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MH and EDU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MH has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to EDU (16.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MH dropped -49.42% vs EDU's -95.61%.
EDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MH and EDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer