PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MH vs. EDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

MH vs. EDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MH vs. EDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MH
McGraw Hill, Inc
-16.97%-2.94%
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
2.91%22.29%

Fundamentals

EPS

MH:

-$0.56

EDU:

$2.39

PS Ratio

MH:

0.83

EDU:

1.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

MH:

$2.11B

EDU:

$5.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MH:

$1.71B

EDU:

$2.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

MH:

$574.43M

EDU:

$693.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MH achieves a -16.97% return, which is significantly lower than EDU's 2.91% return.


MH

1D
3.32%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
-16.97%
6M
9.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EDU

1D
3.55%
1M
3.62%
YTD
2.91%
6M
7.94%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
-16.79%
10Y*
5.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MH vs. EDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MH

EDU
EDU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
EDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MH vs. EDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McGraw Hill, Inc (MH) and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MH vs. EDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHEDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.24

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between MH and EDU is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MH vs. EDU - Dividend Comparison

MH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MH
McGraw Hill, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
1.06%1.09%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.46%0.00%1.28%

Drawdowns

MH vs. EDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MH drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, smaller than the maximum EDU drawdown of -95.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MH and EDU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MHEDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.06%

-95.61%

+59.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.85%

-70.60%

+46.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-32.62%

+14.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.53%

Volatility

MH vs. EDU - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MHEDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.10%

38.37%

+22.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.10%

73.28%

-12.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.10%

59.63%

+1.47%

Financials

MH vs. EDU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McGraw Hill, Inc and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
434.16M
1.19B
(MH) Total Revenue
(EDU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MH vs. EDU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between McGraw Hill, Inc and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
85.3%
53.3%
Portfolio components
MH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a gross profit of 370.32M and revenue of 434.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.3%.

EDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 635.85M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.

MH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported an operating income of 30.39M and revenue of 434.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

EDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported an operating income of 66.44M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

MH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McGraw Hill, Inc reported a net income of -20.20M and revenue of 434.16M, resulting in a net margin of -4.7%.

EDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported a net income of 45.54M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.