MGSMX vs. NMI
MGSMX (DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund) and NMI (Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MGSMX returned 1.58%/yr vs 2.62%/yr for NMI. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MGSMX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for NMI.
Performance
MGSMX vs. NMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGSMX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than NMI's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MGSMX has underperformed NMI with an annualized return of 1.58%, while NMI has yielded a comparatively higher 2.62% annualized return.
MGSMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.57%
NMI
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- 9.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $219.76K | $204.65K | $195.03K |
MGSMX vs. NMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGSMX DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund | 0.90% | 4.06% | 2.86% | 3.52% | -3.40% | 0.26% | 2.94% | 4.13% | 1.47% | 0.96% |
NMI Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | 10.83% | 10.52% | 7.03% | 1.90% | -15.09% | 3.86% | 4.70% | 16.02% | -8.07% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGSMX and NMI is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1995 | 0.12 |
The correlation between MGSMX and NMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGSMX vs. NMI — Risk / Return Rank
MGSMX
NMI
MGSMX vs. NMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (MGSMX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGSMX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.23 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.30 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.97 | 5.79 | -0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGSMX vs. NMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGSMX drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, smaller than the maximum NMI drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGSMX and NMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGSMX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -28.92% | +21.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.16% | -10.96% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.62% | -11.32% | +9.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.87% | -28.92% | +23.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.87% | -28.92% | +23.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -3.53% | +3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -5.91% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 2.46% | -2.02% |
Volatility
MGSMX vs. NMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (MGSMX) is 0.59%, while Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that MGSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGSMX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 2.33% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.07% | 14.87% | -13.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35% | 15.60% | -14.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 14.72% | -13.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.61% | 15.03% | -13.42% |
MGSMX vs. NMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGSMX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than NMI's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGSMX vs. NMI - Dividend Comparison
MGSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than NMI's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGSMX DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund | 2.77% | 3.26% | 2.72% | 2.01% | 1.19% | 1.15% | 2.00% | 2.44% | 2.05% | 1.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NMI Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | 4.25% | 4.59% | 4.63% | 4.04% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 5.12% | 4.21% | 4.45% | 4.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGSMX and NMI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMI has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to MGSMX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGSMX dropped -7.81% vs NMI's -28.92%.
MGSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGSMX and NMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer