PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGSEX vs. ARSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGSEX achieves a 55.31% return, which is significantly higher than ARSVX's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MGSEX has outperformed ARSVX with an annualized return of 18.64%, while ARSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.40% annualized return.


MGSEX

1D
0.92%
1M
9.01%
YTD
55.31%
6M
57.70%
1Y
92.20%
3Y*
32.41%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
18.64%

ARSVX

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.00%
YTD
3.07%
6M
1.86%
1Y
-2.83%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGSEX
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund
55.31%41.56%7.23%-4.82%-27.91%0.83%38.74%80.58%-3.77%20.26%
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
3.07%-7.36%14.05%14.86%-6.49%21.14%1.84%38.29%-6.96%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MGSEX and ARSVX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2005

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between MGSEX and ARSVX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGSEX vs. ARSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGSEX
MGSEX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MGSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MGSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSVX
ARSVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ARSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGSEXARSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.00

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.54

-0.10

+6.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.76

-0.20

+20.96

MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGSEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the ARSVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGSEX and ARSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGSEX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, which is greater than ARSVX's maximum drawdown of -54.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGSEX and ARSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGSEXARSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.06%

-54.85%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-16.62%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-19.21%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.13%

-19.21%

-23.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.32%

-40.52%

-4.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.28%

+10.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-8.68%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

8.38%

-3.88%

Volatility

MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) at 3.22%. This indicates that MGSEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGSEXARSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.81%

3.22%

+12.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.20%

13.85%

+10.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.69%

17.14%

+10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

17.85%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.32%

19.36%

+6.96%

MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGSEX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSVX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Dividend Comparison

MGSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while ARSVX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.50%4.78%3.87%7.75%0.00%12.10%13.01%14.96%4.96%6.51%
MGSEX
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund
0.09%0.14%0.47%0.11%0.00%83.77%4.35%59.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGSEX and ARSVX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGSEX has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to ARSVX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGSEX dropped -62.06% vs ARSVX's -54.85%.

MGSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGSEX and ARSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer