MGSEX vs. ARSVX
MGSEX (AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund) and ARSVX (AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - MGSEX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by AMG, while ARSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MGSEX returned 18.64%/yr vs 9.40%/yr for ARSVX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGSEX charges 1.18%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ARSVX.
Performance
MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGSEX achieves a 55.31% return, which is significantly higher than ARSVX's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MGSEX has outperformed ARSVX with an annualized return of 18.64%, while ARSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.40% annualized return.
MGSEX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 55.31%
- 6M
- 57.70%
- 1Y
- 92.20%
- 3Y*
- 32.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
ARSVX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- -2.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund | 55.31% | 41.56% | 7.23% | -4.82% | -27.91% | 0.83% | 38.74% | 80.58% | -3.77% | 20.26% |
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 3.07% | -7.36% | 14.05% | 14.86% | -6.49% | 21.14% | 1.84% | 38.29% | -6.96% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGSEX and ARSVX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2005 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGSEX and ARSVX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGSEX vs. ARSVX — Risk / Return Rank
MGSEX
ARSVX
MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGSEX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.00 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.54 | -0.10 | +6.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.76 | -0.20 | +20.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGSEX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, which is greater than ARSVX's maximum drawdown of -54.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGSEX and ARSVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGSEX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.06% | -54.85% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.34% | -16.62% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -19.21% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.13% | -19.21% | -23.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.32% | -40.52% | -4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.28% | +10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -8.68% | -5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 8.38% | -3.88% |
Volatility
MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) at 3.22%. This indicates that MGSEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGSEX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.81% | 3.22% | +12.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.20% | 13.85% | +10.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.69% | 17.14% | +10.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 17.85% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.32% | 19.36% | +6.96% |
MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGSEX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSVX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGSEX vs. ARSVX - Dividend Comparison
MGSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while ARSVX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 4.78% | 3.87% | 7.75% | 0.00% | 12.10% | 13.01% | 14.96% | 4.96% | 6.51% |
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 83.77% | 4.35% | 59.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGSEX and ARSVX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGSEX has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to ARSVX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGSEX dropped -62.06% vs ARSVX's -54.85%.
MGSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGSEX and ARSVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer