ARSVX vs. ACWDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ARSVX (AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund) and ACWDX (AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - ARSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG, while ACWDX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, ARSVX returned 9.24%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for ACWDX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARSVX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ACWDX.

Performance

ARSVX vs. ACWDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARSVX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than ACWDX's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ARSVX has underperformed ACWDX with an annualized return of 9.24%, while ACWDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.

ARSVX

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: -1.46%
• 3Y*: 6.53%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 9.24%

ACWDX

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 17.13%
• 6M: 14.41%
• 1Y: 21.78%
• 3Y*: 12.83%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: 11.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARSVX vs. ACWDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund	3.28%	-7.36%	14.05%	14.86%	-6.49%	21.14%	1.84%	38.29%	-6.96%	11.73%
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	17.13%	0.29%	9.27%	21.13%	-22.32%	12.52%	45.63%	20.24%	-5.14%	18.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ARSVX and ACWDX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2010	0.82

The correlation between ARSVX and ACWDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ARSVX vs. ACWDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARSVX

ARSVX Risk / Return Rank: 2
ARSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ARSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ARSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ARSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ARSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ACWDX

ACWDX Risk / Return Rank: 16
ACWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ACWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
ACWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ACWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ACWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARSVX vs. ACWDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARSVX	ACWDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	1.01	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	1.37	-1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.21	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	1.48	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.10	3.99	-4.09

ARSVX vs. ACWDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARSVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the ACWDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARSVX and ACWDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARSVX vs. ACWDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARSVX drawdown since its inception was -54.85%, which is greater than ACWDX's maximum drawdown of -38.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSVX and ACWDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARSVX	ACWDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.85%	-38.86%	-15.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.62%	-14.99%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.21%	-26.64%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.21%	-32.74%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.52%	-38.86%	-1.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.10%	0.00%	-10.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.68%	-10.03%	+1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.36%	5.53%	+2.83%

Volatility

ARSVX vs. ACWDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) is 3.35%, while AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that ARSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARSVX	ACWDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	6.83%	-3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	18.78%	-4.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	22.00%	-4.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.85%	22.08%	-4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.36%	23.44%	-4.08%

ARSVX vs. ACWDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWDX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARSVX vs. ACWDX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARSVX nor ACWDX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.74%	0.00%	2.04%	58.27%	4.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.50%	4.78%	3.87%	7.75%	0.00%	12.10%	13.01%	14.96%	4.96%	6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARSVX and ACWDX in my portfolio?

ARSVX and ACWDX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARSVX or ACWDX?

ACWDX has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to ARSVX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARSVX dropped -54.85% vs ACWDX's -38.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.