MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MGRW.TO (Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF) and PINC.TO (Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MGRW.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Mackenzie, while PINC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGRW.TO returned 11.35%/yr vs 6.76%/yr for PINC.TO. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MGRW.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PINC.TO.

Performance

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) and Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGRW.TO achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than PINC.TO's 17.29% return.

MGRW.TO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: 8.72%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 1Y: 22.91%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.87%

PINC.TO

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.34%
• 6M: 14.51%
• YTD: 17.29%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF	CA$72.01K	CA$77.36K	CA$75.63K
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	CA$17.08K	CA$13.56K	CA$13.69K

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF	10.74%	18.19%	21.41%	15.35%	-9.30%	13.37%	7.50%
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	17.29%	14.41%	11.54%	0.95%	-12.11%	21.51%	11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MGRW.TO and PINC.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2020	0.35

Return for Risk

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGRW.TO

MGRW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MGRW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MGRW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MGRW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
MGRW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

PINC.TO

PINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) and Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGRW.TO	PINC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	3.78	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	5.37	-2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.78	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	6.71	-3.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	26.05	-13.31

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGRW.TO and PINC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGRW.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum PINC.TO drawdown of -43.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRW.TO and PINC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGRW.TO	PINC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-43.84%	+26.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.72%	-3.59%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.17%	-8.55%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.20%	-21.04%	+3.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-0.94%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-5.79%	+2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	0.92%	+0.78%

Volatility

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) at 1.64%. This indicates that MGRW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PINC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGRW.TO	PINC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	1.64%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.57%	5.04%	+3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.45%	6.37%	+4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.78%	8.38%	+2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.49%	14.69%	-4.20%

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGRW.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PINC.TO's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGRW.TO vs. PINC.TO - Dividend Comparison

MGRW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than PINC.TO's 4.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF	1.71%	1.84%	1.93%	2.28%	2.44%	1.77%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund	4.43%	5.05%	5.48%	5.78%	5.51%	4.60%	5.33%	5.06%	3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGRW.TO and PINC.TO in my portfolio?

MGRW.TO and PINC.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MGRW.TO or PINC.TO?

On fees, MGRW.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGRW.TO or PINC.TO?

MGRW.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PINC.TO.

What is the main difference between MGRW.TO and PINC.TO?

MGRW.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while PINC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MGRW.TO and 1.04% for PINC.TO.