MGRAX vs. FISMX
MGRAX (MFS International Growth Fund) and FISMX (Fidelity International Small Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - MGRAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by MFS, while FISMX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, MGRAX returned 9.95%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for FISMX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGRAX charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for FISMX.
Performance
MGRAX vs. FISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGRAX achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than FISMX's 9.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MGRAX has outperformed FISMX with an annualized return of 9.95%, while FISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.
MGRAX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
FISMX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
MGRAX vs. FISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGRAX MFS International Growth Fund | 1.74% | 20.73% | 8.82% | 14.54% | -15.31% | 9.20% | 15.45% | 26.83% | -9.09% | 32.15% |
FISMX Fidelity International Small Cap Fund | 9.34% | 24.73% | 0.05% | 19.62% | -16.66% | 13.44% | 9.98% | 21.45% | -16.08% | 31.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGRAX and FISMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2002 | 0.84 |
The correlation between MGRAX and FISMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGRAX vs. FISMX — Risk / Return Rank
MGRAX
FISMX
MGRAX vs. FISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) and Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGRAX | FISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.24 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 1.50 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | 5.27 | -3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGRAX vs. FISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGRAX drawdown since its inception was -55.29%, smaller than the maximum FISMX drawdown of -60.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRAX and FISMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGRAX | FISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.29% | -60.94% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -10.71% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.66% | -12.70% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.58% | -31.07% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.58% | -38.80% | +8.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.93% | -1.83% | -3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | -10.63% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 3.04% | +0.78% |
Volatility
MGRAX vs. FISMX - Volatility Comparison
MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) at 4.85%. This indicates that MGRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGRAX | FISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 4.85% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 10.81% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 12.78% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 13.66% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 14.08% | +1.68% |
MGRAX vs. FISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGRAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FISMX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGRAX vs. FISMX - Dividend Comparison
MGRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than FISMX's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISMX Fidelity International Small Cap Fund | 3.28% | 3.58% | 2.64% | 1.87% | 0.70% | 7.28% | 0.83% | 2.32% | 6.14% | 2.46% | 2.70% | 2.80% |
MGRAX MFS International Growth Fund | 5.26% | 5.35% | 5.99% | 2.56% | 2.69% | 6.62% | 0.56% | 1.42% | 3.82% | 2.26% | 1.01% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGRAX and FISMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGRAX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FISMX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGRAX dropped -55.29% vs FISMX's -60.94%.
FISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGRAX and FISMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer