PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGQIX vs. MBXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGQIX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio (MGQIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGQIX achieves a -4.38% return, which is significantly lower than MBXAX's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MGQIX has underperformed MBXAX with an annualized return of 6.35%, while MBXAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.41% annualized return.


MGQIX

1D
1.36%
1M
-2.01%
6M
-2.99%
YTD
-4.38%
1Y
-28.62%
3Y*
-2.24%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*
6.35%
ALL TIME*
6.95%

MBXAX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.04%
6M
8.41%
YTD
12.74%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
7.41%
ALL TIME*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MGQIX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGQIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio
-4.38%-19.55%16.34%21.69%-20.69%18.61%15.97%32.94%0.43%21.67%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
12.74%4.13%13.17%-0.91%7.46%16.62%-0.72%13.59%-2.43%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MGQIX and MBXAX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.47

The correlation between MGQIX and MBXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGQIX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGQIX
MGQIX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
MGQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MGQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXAX
MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGQIX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio (MGQIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGQIXMBXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

1.40

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

3.77

-4.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

14.56

-15.80

MGQIX vs. MBXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGQIX Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the MBXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGQIX and MBXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGQIX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGQIX drawdown since its inception was -47.63%, which is greater than MBXAX's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGQIX and MBXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGQIXMBXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.63%

-31.75%

-15.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.59%

-3.89%

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.63%

-15.66%

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.63%

-15.66%

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.63%

-31.75%

-15.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.25%

-2.69%

-39.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-4.00%

-3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.26%

1.05%

+23.21%

Volatility

MGQIX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio (MGQIX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) at 1.59%. This indicates that MGQIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGQIXMBXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

1.59%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

4.87%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.34%

6.87%

+22.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.14%

11.39%

+14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

13.36%

+8.54%

MGQIX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGQIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGQIX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MGQIX nor MBXAX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%2.43%2.02%7.57%0.00%3.92%4.96%3.07%3.35%1.82%0.00%
MGQIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio
0.00%0.00%30.72%0.47%0.71%1.79%2.54%4.84%8.37%5.51%8.22%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGQIX and MBXAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGQIX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to MBXAX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGQIX dropped -47.63% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.

MBXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGQIX and MBXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer