PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGQIX vs. LVAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGQIX vs. LVAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio (MGQIX) and LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGQIX achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly lower than LVAGX's 24.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MGQIX has underperformed LVAGX with an annualized return of 6.65%, while LVAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.


MGQIX

1D
-1.08%
1M
0.95%
YTD
-3.47%
6M
-27.29%
1Y
-28.67%
3Y*
-0.36%
5Y*
-0.69%
10Y*
6.65%

LVAGX

1D
-0.70%
1M
7.71%
YTD
24.37%
6M
26.59%
1Y
46.58%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGQIX vs. LVAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGQIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio
-3.47%-19.55%16.34%21.69%-20.69%18.61%15.97%32.94%0.43%21.67%
LVAGX
LSV Global Value Fund
24.37%26.84%6.86%18.76%-8.44%21.07%0.15%21.99%-15.70%21.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MGQIX and LVAGX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.74

The correlation between MGQIX and LVAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGQIX vs. LVAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGQIX
MGQIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MGQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MGQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAGX
LVAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LVAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGQIX vs. LVAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio (MGQIX) and LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGQIXLVAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.66

-0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

6.63

-7.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

25.10

-26.46

MGQIX vs. LVAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGQIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the LVAGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGQIX and LVAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGQIXLVAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

3.67

-4.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.85

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.70

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.59

-0.24

Drawdowns

MGQIX vs. LVAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGQIX drawdown since its inception was -47.63%, which is greater than LVAGX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGQIX and LVAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGQIXLVAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.63%

-42.32%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.59%

-7.03%

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.63%

-16.13%

-31.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.63%

-23.77%

-23.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.63%

-42.32%

-5.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.70%

-0.70%

-41.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-7.02%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.98%

1.85%

+19.13%

Volatility

MGQIX vs. LVAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio (MGQIX) is 3.16%, while LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that MGQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGQIXLVAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

4.32%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.39%

9.77%

+21.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.93%

12.70%

+16.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.02%

15.32%

+10.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

16.95%

+4.97%

MGQIX vs. LVAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGQIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAGX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGQIX vs. LVAGX - Dividend Comparison

MGQIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAGX
LSV Global Value Fund
5.13%6.38%2.44%2.69%1.52%2.04%1.66%1.99%4.71%1.86%2.54%2.35%
MGQIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio
0.00%0.00%30.72%0.47%0.71%1.79%2.54%4.84%8.37%5.51%8.22%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGQIX and LVAGX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVAGX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to MGQIX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGQIX dropped -47.63% vs LVAGX's -42.32%.

LVAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGQIX and LVAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer