MGPIX vs. WWNPX
MGPIX (ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX returned 7.80%/yr vs 17.86%/yr for WWNPX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGPIX charges 1.69%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.
Performance
MGPIX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGPIX achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than WWNPX's 12.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 7.80%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.86% annualized return.
MGPIX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
WWNPX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -11.42%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- -3.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- 17.86%
MGPIX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 19.55% | 5.56% | 13.77% | 15.40% | -20.47% | -6.46% | 20.28% | 24.09% | -12.06% | 18.08% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 12.75% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 28.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGPIX and WWNPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGPIX and WWNPX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGPIX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
MGPIX
WWNPX
MGPIX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGPIX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.00 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | -0.18 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | -0.43 | +12.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGPIX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGPIX drawdown since its inception was -54.61%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGPIX and WWNPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGPIX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.61% | -67.87% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -27.71% | +17.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.86% | -41.13% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.84% | -41.13% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.84% | -43.51% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -31.66% | +31.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -13.93% | +2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 11.77% | -9.24% |
Volatility
MGPIX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) is 5.55%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that MGPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGPIX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 9.71% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 26.86% | -13.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 33.74% | -16.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 33.01% | -10.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 28.71% | -7.42% |
MGPIX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGPIX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGPIX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
MGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than WWNPX's 7.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 2.86% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 3.26% | 1.47% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 7.28% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGPIX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWNPX has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to MGPIX (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGPIX dropped -54.61% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.
MGPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGPIX and WWNPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer