MGPIX vs. ENPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX).
MGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001. ENPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.
Performance
MGPIX vs. ENPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGPIX vs. ENPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.10% | 5.56% | 13.77% | 15.40% | -20.47% | -6.46% | 20.28% | 24.09% | -12.06% | 18.08% |
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 59.46% | 4.99% | 2.30% | -7.46% | 92.17% | 82.32% | -53.71% | 10.35% | -30.54% | -5.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGPIX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than ENPIX's 59.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX has underperformed ENPIX with an annualized return of 5.90%, while ENPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.54% annualized return.
MGPIX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
ENPIX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 11.86%
- YTD
- 59.46%
- 6M
- 59.48%
- 1Y
- 46.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 29.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGPIX vs. ENPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGPIX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ENPIX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGPIX vs. ENPIX — Risk / Return Rank
MGPIX
ENPIX
MGPIX vs. ENPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.29 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.70 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.25 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.83 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 4.11 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.29 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.77 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.21 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.13 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGPIX and ENPIX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MGPIX vs. ENPIX - Dividend Comparison
MGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than ENPIX's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 3.42% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 3.26% | 1.47% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 1.73% | 2.76% | 3.19% | 0.87% | 2.76% | 1.59% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.57% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
MGPIX vs. ENPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGPIX drawdown since its inception was -54.61%, smaller than the maximum ENPIX drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGPIX and ENPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.61% | -90.12% | +35.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -27.20% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.84% | -36.48% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.84% | -84.54% | +40.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.17% | -3.26% | -10.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -37.08% | +25.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 12.11% | -8.95% |
Volatility
MGPIX vs. ENPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) is 7.03%, while ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that MGPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGPIX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 7.59% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 20.88% | -8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 37.08% | -15.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 38.87% | -16.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 44.55% | -23.39% |