MGNR vs. ILIT
MGNR (American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF) and ILIT (Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. MGNR is actively managed, while ILIT is passively managed. Over the past year, MGNR returned 74.12% vs 181.76% for ILIT. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGNR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ILIT.
Performance
MGNR vs. ILIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MGNR having a 25.90% return and ILIT slightly lower at 25.82%.
MGNR
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 25.90%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 74.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILIT
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- -12.04%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 35.19%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGNR vs. ILIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF | 25.90% | 50.57% | 22.78% |
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | 25.82% | 81.51% | -23.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGNR and ILIT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MGNR and ILIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGNR vs. ILIT — Risk / Return Rank
MGNR
ILIT
MGNR vs. ILIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGNR | ILIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.24 | 3.74 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.77 | 3.84 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.47 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.02 | 8.00 | -1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.36 | 22.21 | +2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGNR | ILIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 3.74 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | -0.09 | +1.86 |
Drawdowns
MGNR vs. ILIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGNR drawdown since its inception was -22.06%, smaller than the maximum ILIT drawdown of -73.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGNR and ILIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGNR | ILIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.06% | -73.69% | +51.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -22.86% | +10.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -17.69% | +15.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -45.87% | +42.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 8.22% | -5.17% |
Volatility
MGNR vs. ILIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is 6.59%, while Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that MGNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGNR | ILIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 11.95% | -5.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 33.28% | -15.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 48.97% | -25.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 41.58% | -16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 41.58% | -16.55% |
MGNR vs. ILIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGNR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ILIT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGNR vs. ILIT - Dividend Comparison
MGNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than ILIT's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | 1.81% | 2.27% | 6.48% | 0.69% |
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF | 1.07% | 1.17% | 0.79% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGNR and ILIT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILIT has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to MGNR (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGNR dropped -22.06% vs ILIT's -73.69%.
On 1-year performance, ILIT leads with 181.76% vs 74.12% for MGNR. On fees, ILIT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MGNR has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILIT has performed better with a 181.76% return vs 74.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILIT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MGNR.
ILIT has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.07% for MGNR.
They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MGNR and 0.47% for ILIT.
ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGNR and ILIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer