MGNR vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MGNR (American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGNR is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by American Beacon, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. MGNR is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, MGNR returned 74.30% vs 2014.90% for BWET. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGNR charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

MGNR vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGNR achieves a 25.87% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 990.13% return.

MGNR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 25.87%
• 6M: 27.66%
• 1Y: 74.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 11.71%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 990.13%
• 6M: 857.64%
• 1Y: 2,014.90%
• 3Y*: 145.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGNR vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	25.87%	50.57%	22.78%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	990.13%	96.22%	-43.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MGNR and BWET is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024	0.00

Return for Risk

MGNR vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGNR

MGNR Risk / Return Rank: 90
MGNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MGNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
MGNR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MGNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MGNR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGNR vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MGNR	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	20.67	-17.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	6.77	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.99	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.03	66.60	-60.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.40	176.91	-152.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MGNR vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGNR Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 20.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGNR and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MGNR	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	20.67	-17.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.76	2.01	-0.24

Drawdowns

MGNR vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGNR drawdown since its inception was -22.06%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGNR and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGNR	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.06%	-56.90%	+34.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-30.64%	+18.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-0.90%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-24.06%	+20.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	11.51%	-8.46%

Volatility

MGNR vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is 6.57%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 28.88%. This indicates that MGNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGNR	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.57%	28.88%	-22.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.65%	88.79%	-71.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.01%	98.73%	-75.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.01%	70.70%	-45.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.01%	70.70%	-45.69%

MGNR vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGNR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGNR vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

MGNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	1.07%	1.17%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGNR and BWET in my portfolio?

MGNR and BWET have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGNR or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (28.88%) compared to MGNR (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGNR dropped -22.06% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, MGNR or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 2014.90% vs 74.30% for MGNR. On fees, MGNR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MGNR has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MGNR or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 2014.90% return vs 74.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGNR or BWET?

MGNR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MGNR or BWET?

MGNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between MGNR and BWET?

MGNR is categorized as Energy Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MGNR and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.67 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.