MGINX vs. PDX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX).

MGINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 14, 1995. PDX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Feb 1, 2019.

Performance

MGINX vs. PDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MGINX vs. PDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund	0.35%	14.73%	3.56%	9.15%	-6.87%	6.36%	2.26%	9.48%
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund	16.74%	-10.59%	36.99%	44.51%	23.02%	68.79%	-44.20%	-10.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGINX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than PDX's 16.74% return.

MGINX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -4.70%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 11.90%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 4.26%
• 10Y*: 5.90%

PDX

• 1D: -2.58%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 16.74%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 7.88%
• 3Y*: 27.73%
• 5Y*: 26.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGINX vs. PDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGINX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than PDX's 2.31% expense ratio.

PDX

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund

MGINX

DWS Global Macro Fund

Return for Risk

MGINX vs. PDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGINX

MGINX Risk / Return Rank: 76
MGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
MGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
MGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PDX

PDX Risk / Return Rank: 13
PDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
PDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PDX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PDX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGINX vs. PDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MGINX	PDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.35	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	0.59	+1.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.10	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	0.46	+1.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.72	1.13	+6.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MGINX vs. PDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the PDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGINX and PDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MGINX	PDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	0.35	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	1.04	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.30	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between MGINX and PDX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MGINX vs. PDX - Dividend Comparison

MGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than PDX's 21.27% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund	2.25%	1.82%	2.15%	2.88%	4.76%	1.20%	0.81%	3.23%	6.82%
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund	21.27%	24.34%	6.31%	4.30%	5.89%	5.28%	14.11%	9.58%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MGINX vs. PDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGINX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, smaller than the maximum PDX drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGINX and PDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGINX	PDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.39%	-80.63%	+17.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-20.21%	+13.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.16%	-37.24%	+25.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.25%	-15.21%	+9.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.83%	-18.92%	+5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	8.25%	-6.68%

Volatility

MGINX vs. PDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) is 3.52%, while PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that MGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGINX	PDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	5.49%	-1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.88%	11.47%	-5.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.03%	22.80%	-14.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.67%	25.81%	-19.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.50%	36.86%	-29.36%