PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGINX vs. GTAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGINX vs. GTAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGINX achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than GTAIX's 14.34% return.


MGINX

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
3.53%
6M
3.51%
1Y
12.31%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
6.08%

GTAIX

1D
0.77%
1M
2.59%
YTD
14.34%
6M
13.68%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGINX vs. GTAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
3.53%14.73%3.56%9.15%-6.87%6.36%2.26%12.61%1.91%
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
14.34%13.49%8.39%15.59%-14.49%9.25%-0.10%16.08%-8.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MGINX and GTAIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018

0.78

The correlation between MGINX and GTAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGINX vs. GTAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGINX
MGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GTAIX
GTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGINX vs. GTAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGINXGTAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.54

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

5.37

-3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

22.43

-16.09

MGINX vs. GTAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the GTAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGINX and GTAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGINX vs. GTAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGINX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than GTAIX's maximum drawdown of -24.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGINX and GTAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGINXGTAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.39%

-24.25%

-39.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-4.51%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-11.89%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.16%

-19.43%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.46%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.74%

-4.80%

-8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.08%

+0.84%

Volatility

MGINX vs. GTAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) is 3.05%, while Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that MGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGINXGTAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.40%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.85%

7.27%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.85%

8.59%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.91%

10.79%

-3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.48%

11.51%

-4.03%

MGINX vs. GTAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGINX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GTAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGINX vs. GTAIX - Dividend Comparison

MGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than GTAIX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
4.83%5.82%3.38%2.69%1.65%2.35%0.82%1.77%1.92%
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
1.80%1.82%2.15%2.88%4.76%1.20%0.81%3.23%6.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGINX and GTAIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTAIX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to MGINX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGINX dropped -63.39% vs GTAIX's -24.25%.

GTAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGINX and GTAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer